So why not? I'll be as "Buddhist" as possible in my approach to the current, rather dire political scene. Here, for example, are some reflections on a currently proposed bill in the House of Representatives to terminate the Environmental Protection Agency.
10 March
2017
Rep. Dana
Rohrabacher,
101 Main
Street #380
Huntington
Beach, CA 92648
Dear
Congressman,
Re: HR
861—To Terminate the Environmental Protection Agency
I note
from your website that you reject the conclusion of virtually all of the
world’s respected scientists in the matter of climate change. In this you are
in apparent agreement with Scott Pruitt, the new head of the EPA, who yesterday
stated his personal belief (he is not a scientist) that human production of
carbon dioxide is not “a primary contributor to the global warming that we
see.” Coming from the man whom the president appointed to head the agency that
protects our environment, this is a shocking pronouncement.
HR 861 is
currently before the US House of Representatives. I ask you to seriously
consider its implications before it comes up for a vote.
In its
aim to “terminate the EPA,” HR 861 supports the goal of the agency’s new head.
According to a New York Times report today, the president “is expected to
announce an executive order next week directing Mr. Pruitt to begin the legal
process of unwinding the climate change regulations on emissions from power
plants.” This is not environmental protection, but an assault on the
environment. For an administration that harps constantly on the need to “keep
the American people safe” it is a blatant and unquestionably harmful
contradiction. Terrorism is not our only, nor even our most imminent threat.
And
shouldn’t the EPA be doing something about the Trump directive to start rolling
back protections for the nation’s water supply in the Clean Water Act. Water is
quite simply the most important of our natural resources. To allow its
contamination is, once again, to make a mockery of claims to keep the American
people safe.
In a
related issue, Trump’s campaign pledge to tear up the nearly 200-nation Paris
climate change agreement is now being modified, according to what I read, to
simply reneging on the Obama pledge to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions.
This retreat is small comfort to those of us who believe this country should be
exercising leadership in the fight to save our planet from man-made
destruction.
I ask you
to vote against the passage of HR 861.
Respectfully,
Peter
Clothier, Ph.D.
No comments:
Post a Comment