The Buddha Diaries tries to stay true to its mission: to get to the heart of the matter. "The matter" is normally in some significant way related to meditation practice or the teaching of the dharma, or simply on the predicament of being human. and I happen to believe that this perspective is valuable in these dire political times. In the past couple of days, I have been thinking about how certain beneficial aspects of socialism have been ignored or purposely distorted in America, and how the word itself has been used as a weapon to discredit the political philosophy. Compassionate at its heart and in its intention, socialism has at times and in various places been poorly represented in its practice. But--especially with the human populations of the world exploding--it does suggest ways of living together peaceably on this planet Earth, and sharing our human potential as well as our limited resources.
This short essay seeks to encapsulate some of my thoughts...
SOCIALISM: THE POWER OF THE WORD
I’m no historian, but I do have a layman’s take on how we
arrived at our current national nightmare. It’s just one, personal approach,
and it’s conditioned in part by my having grown up in England since before
World War II, and during the war and the post-war period, and particularly by what
I know of my earliest years. I was born in the northern coal-mining town of
Newcastle-on-Tyne, where my father was the incumbent priest of a slum parish.
Poverty and hunger were the norm, and my father, unsurprisingly, was an ardent
socialist—and I inherited his political beliefs.
You can imagine, then, how surprised I was, with this
background, to discover when I first arrived on this side of the pond, that “socialism”
was a word so vile that it could not be uttered in polite society. I exaggerate
only a little. I did not know much of American history, but was vaguely aware
of the social achievements of FDR and the subsequent Communist scare of the
1950s. When I become a citizen in 1972, I was still required to swear, under
oath, that I was not then and had never been “a member of the Communist Party.”
I thought the exercise a little absurd, but went ahead and dutifully swore,
thankful that at least I had not been asked if I was a socialist. (To be quite
honest, I still have difficulty with the notion of swearing allegiance to a
country or its flag, but that’s another essay.)
As I was growing up, then, the words “conservative” and
“socialist” had rather different connotations than they do here in the US. In
broad terms, the Conservative Party represented the interests of wealth and
social privilege; the Socialist, or Labour Party stood for the working class,
the poor, and the underprivileged. I had never questioned my allegiance to the
latter.
Since my arrival in the United States, even the (formerly)
less charged term “liberal” has come to share in the disrepute of socialism. By
those on the right, it is most often uttered with angry contempt for those
leaning more to the left. And, in a curious and—to my mind—unfortunate
reversal, those with the most at stake in the social contract have been
co-opted, no matter their own interest, into the conservative camp. Political
ideology failed, in the form of McCarthyism; but corporate interests have
proved successful in deluding the working classes and the poor into the belief
that socialism—or liberalism—is anathema. The word itself summons nothing but
fear and loathing. The means to achieve this end has been a continuous stream
of simplistic slogans fed out by those in power in the form of barely disguised
propaganda—facile platitudes about such things as “individual freedom”, “big
government” and the tiresome familiarity of anti-tax rhetoric, repeated so
often and in so many ways that they have come to be accepted as irrefutable
truth.
So it is that here, in this wealthiest nation in the history
of the world, we have sacrificed all sense of social responsibility on the
altar of delusory individual rights. We have been persuaded to submit to the
axiom that government is the great Satan, and that we can dispense with its
services—most notably those that provide for others than ourselves. The rabid
opposition to universal health care, readily disparaged as “socialized
medicine,” is a case in point. Every other country at our stage of economic development
has found a way, at considerably less expense than ours, to assure the
protection of its citizens from the personal, financial and emotional ravages
of sickness, injury and old age. Only here in America, it seems, do people
clamor angrily against even the relatively meager coverage (for themselves!)
achieved under Obamacare. Only here in America do the insurance companies and drug
manufacturers wield sufficient power to prevail against all common sense and human
compassion in their advancement of a for-profit system that functions not for
the health of citizens but exclusively for corporate benefit.
It’s not only health care, of course. The fear of socialism
prevails in every aspect of our lives. It’s rooted deeply in our system of
justice, which benefits wealth and privilege to the detriment of the poor and
powerless. It is a malignant force in the perpetuation of racial prejudice. It
disempowers our government from sensible regulation—whether of financial
markets, banks, air and water pollution, even guns… It is particularly pernicious
in delaying the increasingly urgent need to manage and protect our threatened
resources and our natural environment. And so on.
Some form of socialism is the accepted norm these days in
European nations, where it partners in various ways with free-market capitalism
without apparent detriment to the economic well-being of actual people—even the
very wealthy. It thrives, indeed, in our own country, in multiple unacknowledged
ways. The so-called entitlements that constitute our indispensible social
safety net go unrecognized as socialist programs by many who depend on them:
“Get your government hands off my Medicare!” Yet even these are now under
attack by the right-wing, supposedly conservative politicians who are in ascendancy—those
same politicians who have been elected, and are passionately supported by those
who deplore big government and rail against taxation.
The great question remains unanswered: if the primary and
avowed purpose of the current administration is the “deconstruction” of the
underpinnings of a civilized society, and if they are successful in this
attack, what will happen to those who were duped into unwittingly supporting
them in this endeavor? When will
our new would-be emperor be exposed as a man of unmitigated ignorance and
greed? What innocent child is going to point to his parade and say: “But, Ma,
he has no clothes.”
It seems to me that first we’re going to have to recognize
some rights beyond our own, to accept a common responsibility for our fellow
human beings. We need to educate our young people in a serious way about the
history and the true meaning of socialism; and to become, in our personal and
political lives, just a little bit more socialist ourselves. In the real sense
of that much-maligned, much-despised, much-mistrusted word.
No comments:
Post a Comment