… of the Beasts: Love, Terror, and an American Family in
Hitler’s Berlin.”
I just finished reading this compelling—and frankly somewhat
terrifying—account by Erik Larson of the brief ambassadorship of William E.
Dodd in Berlin from 1933 to 1934, at the time of Adolf
Hitler’s rise to absolute
power. As Larson portrays him, Dodd was an academic and a “Jeffersonian
liberal,” a man of considerable integrity, who was clear-sighted in his
understanding of Nazism and its goals, and prescient about its eventual
militarist aggression. His story has some important and sobering lessons for us
at this critical historical moment in the USA.
Not that our new president* is a Hitler—I prefer to avoid
the Nazi analogies, in part because they serve only to diminish the unmitigated
abomination that was Germany’s National Socialist Party. Nor are his acolytes,
hopefully, the moral equivalent of the likes of Goebbels, Goering and Himmler.
No. The lessons have to do with the importance of vigilance on the part of we,
the governed, to actions and policies that subvert our democratic traditions
and the values that undergird and validate our social relationships. What we
read about in Larson’s book is the slow erosion of those values, and the passivity
or permissiveness that gradually allowed all the normal restraints of civilized
behavior to be abandoned.
It is not only the German people who stood by, some even
applauding, as Hitler and his Nazis first seized, then held on to power with
vicious, unrelenting efficiency. Out of self-interest or self-preservation, the
majority of Germans failed increasingly to challenge what they knew to be lies
and propaganda, and allowed themselves to be swallowed up in a stinking morass
of ignorance and barbarity. They failed, notably, to condemn the conspicuous
evidence of bigotry and cruelty they could not help but notice on the public
streets, before their very eyes.
On our side of the Atlantic, however, things were not that
much better. The diplomatic establishment of mostly Ivy League graduates—a
“pretty good club,” as they were happy to call themselves—was busy subverting
the efforts of Ambassador Dodd to draw attention to what he saw to be a
gathering storm of historic scale. Casually anti-Semitic themselves, these
men—in Larson’s thoroughly persuasive account—were more concerned with matters
of wealth and social status than with Hitler’s increasingly repressive policies
and actions. Their seemingly cavalier and laissez-faire attitudes allowed the
Nazis to promulgate their hatred and advance their agenda virtually
unrestrained by the international code of diplomatic norms.
As for FDR himself, though for the most part lending a
sympathetic ear to Dodd’s warnings, he eventually surrendered to the
isolationism that inspired the majority of Americans—the ignorant clarion call
of “America First” that echoes, appallingly, once again today. The terrible
conclusion that we reach, in reading In
the Garden of Beasts, is that, given vigilance, given honesty and integrity
and sound judgment on the part of many, both within and outside Germany during
those early years, Hitler could—and should—have been halted in his tracks.
Without vigilance, we surrender out integrity slowly, by degrees; and before
long we find that we have abandoned everything that was important to us,
everything that defined who we are as human beings.
This, then, is the lesson for us today. We have already
witnessed crass behavior and political actions we deplore, directions taken
that are alien to who we thought we were. We have already slipped deeper into callousness,
animosity and corruption than most of us thought possible. We cannot afford to
lapse further into the passive acceptance of blatant propaganda and cynical
grabs for power. Larson’s book is a timely reminder that vigilance and, when
necessary, resistance are an urgent civic duty.
No comments:
Post a Comment