Thursday, Dec. 21
We patched togther a not-too-successful breakfast in our
hotel room, with a poor attempt at English breakfast tea made with a
malfunctioning Nespresso machine and granola and yogurt from the supply
provided, as always, in the lobby by the Roger Smith Hotel. Then set out for
the walk to our first stop for the day at the Museum of Modern Art. Passing St.
Pat’s, we stopped for a brief tour of the cathedral...
... before setting out north on
Fifth Avenue...
... to admire the real American Christmas spirit in the sumptuously decorated shop windows, including a couple of beautiful, sparkling small scale dioramas at Tiffany’s...
... and, across the street at Bergdorf Goodman’s, their usual full-scale window extravaganzas...
... to admire the real American Christmas spirit in the sumptuously decorated shop windows, including a couple of beautiful, sparkling small scale dioramas at Tiffany’s...
... and, across the street at Bergdorf Goodman’s, their usual full-scale window extravaganzas...
Having paid our homage to ostentatious materialism, we
turned back down Fifth to 53rd Street and arrived at our original
destination. Like the Met, MoMA had kindly provided me with guest
tickets—particularly, but not exclusively, for a show that had caught my
attention before leaving Los Angeles, “Charles White—Leonardo da Vinci, Curated by David Hammons.” Having spent nearly two years researching what I hoped would
be a book on the African American artist, White—an old friend and colleague
from my days as Dean at Otis Art Institute, I was imagining an exhibition
featuring a comparison of drawings by each of these two master draftsmen, one
time-honored in the annals of history and academia, the other undeservedly
side-lined, in his day, by the great sweep of American mainstream art.
I was amazed—and frankly at first a little chagrined—to be greeted by
something far different in the strange and fascinating display that Hammons had
actually installed—though I should perhaps have expected something poetic and
intellectually challenging from an artist whose own work has confronted us
often with mystery and metaphorical conundrum. The large, low-lit gallery space
was hung with only two images, placed directly across from each other on
opposing walls—a tiny drawing of drapery by Leonardo and White’s very large
“Black Pope”...
... in which the central figure is similarly draped in robes. A third
wall was hung with arcanely detailed, large scale astrological readings of both
artists, inviting the viewer to find points of comparison—and difference
between the two. White’s, appropriately, was filled with the struggle and
suffering with which he was confronted in his life as a black man in a culture
not yet (and still not, today!) resolved in its own bleak, shameful history of
slavery. Hammons slyly invites us into a deeply personal contemplation of a
complexity of earthly issues involving race and religion as well as the
influence of the stars.
We wandered on, from this exhibition, into the current
installation of work from MoMA’s rich collection of 20th century
art. It was soon clear that the museum is making a conscious effort at
diversity: the installation featured a good number of lesser know artists,
including previously minimized or neglected women and artists from other than
Western cultures (Iraq, Iran) alongside the regular canon of artists and art
movements. Still predominant, though, unsurprisingly, was MoMA’s in depth
collection of the work of the two big white guys, Picasso and Matisse.
Upstairs, on the 6th floor, we found the
exhibition “Items: Is Fashion Modern?” comprising, according to the museum’s
description. “111
items of clothing and accessories...
... that have had a strong impact on the world in
the 20th and 21st centuries—and continue to hold currency today. Among them are
pieces as well-known and transformative as the Levi’s 501s, the Breton shirt,
and the Little Black Dress, and as ancient and culturally charged as the sari,
the pearl necklace, the kippah, and the keffiyeh.” An interesting show from the
point of view of cultural history, even though not quite up my alley. We
half-wondered whether any of Ellie’s stepmother’s gifts of high-fashion clothes
to MoMA might be included, but did not find any.
After lunch, we tackled the big Steven Shore exhibition and Louise Bourgeois. I have to say that I was underwhelmed by the former’s conceptual
photographic work—often, it seemed to me, a cataloging of relatively random images whose
metaphorical and formal associations were pretty much left to the imagination
of the viewer. The large landscape images, though, were quite beautiful in
their exquisite detail of rocks, grasses, and so on, seen in the foreground of
great panoramas of some of earth’s most lovely places. I respond, frankly, with
greater emotional connection to the hands-on, heart-out work of an artist like
Louise Bourgeois...
... whose intense and intimate explorations of herself—both her inner life and
the biological of her physical body...
... are much closer to what I myself attempt as a writer. She tells me a great deal about what it means to be a woman, an insight a value as a man who would otherwise have only empathy to go on. She struggles with her self and lays out the result for all to see and share.
... are much closer to what I myself attempt as a writer. She tells me a great deal about what it means to be a woman, an insight a value as a man who would otherwise have only empathy to go on. She struggles with her self and lays out the result for all to see and share.
We left the Modern towards late afternoon, intending, originally, to
find a cab across to our dinner date on Tenth Avenue. Good luck with that! We
headed south on Fifth Avenue, battling immense and growing crowds as we
approached the Rockefeller Center where the masses jammed together, to see not
only the famous Christmas tree and watch the ice skating but also, across
Fifth, to marvel over the spectacular light display on the façade of Saks
department store...
The combination made forward progress almost impossible without the forceful use of shoulder and elbow, but we finally made it as far as 47th Street, where we turned west and walked on through Times Square (another spectacular light show!) and across town to Tenth Street and our dinner destination at the MéMéditerranean restaurant.
The combination made forward progress almost impossible without the forceful use of shoulder and elbow, but we finally made it as far as 47th Street, where we turned west and walked on through Times Square (another spectacular light show!) and across town to Tenth Street and our dinner destination at the MéMéditerranean restaurant.
We found Ellie’s nephew Danny and his wife, Rachel, waiting for us, and I drank a welcome glass of single malt as we waited for Sarah and Tim and our little grandson, Luka. They arrived soon enough, and we all enjoyed a wonderful family reunion over good Mediterranean cuisine...
No comments:
Post a Comment